Demographics details for Drakesboro, KY vs Sanford, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Drakesboro, KY vs Sanford, NC.
| Data | Drakesboro | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 474 | 31,224 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $39,659 | $52,951 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Drakesboro vs Sanford
- The population in Sanford is higher at 31,224, compared to 474 in Drakesboro.
- Residents in Drakesboro have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 34.6 years in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $52,951, compared to $39,659 in Drakesboro.
- In Sanford, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 28.0% in Drakesboro.
- Drakesboro has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.2% in Drakesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Drakesboro vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Drakesboro | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 25 |
| White | 83 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Drakesboro vs Sanford
- In Sanford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 9% in Drakesboro.
- Drakesboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 34% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Drakesboro.
- Sanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 7% in Drakesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanford at 10%, compared to 1% in Drakesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Drakesboro and Sanford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Drakesboro | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 29.5% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 27.7% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Drakesboro vs Sanford
- More residents in Drakesboro report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 17.4% in Sanford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Drakesboro at 29.5% compared to 23.2% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Drakesboro at 27.7% compared to 18.8% in Sanford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sanford at 15.3% compared to 13.8% in Drakesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Drakesboro at 43.3% compared to 41.1% in Sanford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Drakesboro at 27.0% compared to 14.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Drakesboro | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (8) | 1.4% (443) |
| High School Diploma | 28.7% (136) | 12.5% (3,909) |
| Less than High School | 28.3% (134) | 22.6% (7,052) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.8% (4) | 12.9% (4,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Drakesboro vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of residents in Drakesboro have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.4% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Drakesboro hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 12.5% in Sanford.
- More residents in Drakesboro have less than a high school education at 28.3% compared to 22.6% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 0.8% in Drakesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.