Demographics details for Drakesboro, KY vs Fort smith, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Drakesboro, KY vs Fort smith, AR.
Data | Drakesboro | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Population | 474 | 89,992 |
Median Age | 42.7 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $39,659 | $50,799 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Drakesboro vs Fort smith
- The population in Fort smith is higher at 89,992, compared to 474 in Drakesboro.
- Residents in Drakesboro have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has a higher median income of $50,799, compared to $39,659 in Drakesboro.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 28.0% in Drakesboro.
- Drakesboro has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Fort smith.
- The unemployment rate in Drakesboro is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Drakesboro vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Drakesboro | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 8 |
White | 83 | 57 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 7 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Drakesboro vs Fort smith
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Drakesboro at 9% compared to 8% in Fort smith.
- Drakesboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Drakesboro.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 7% in Drakesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort smith at 9%, compared to 1% in Drakesboro.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Drakesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Drakesboro | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.7% |
Depression | 29.5% | 27.8% |
Smoking | 27.7% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 13.2% |
Obesity | 43.3% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Drakesboro vs Fort smith
- More residents in Drakesboro report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 19.6% in Fort smith.
- Depression is more prevalent in Drakesboro at 29.5% compared to 27.8% in Fort smith.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Drakesboro at 27.7% compared to 21.8% in Fort smith.
- Binge drinking is more common in Drakesboro at 13.8% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Obesity rates are higher in Drakesboro at 43.3% compared to 39.5% in Fort smith.
- Disability percentages are higher in Drakesboro at 27.0% compared to 20.0% in Fort smith.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Drakesboro | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (8) | 2.3% (2,029) |
High School Diploma | 28.7% (136) | 14.8% (13,356) |
Less than High School | 28.3% (134) | 19.8% (17,822) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.8% (4) | 16.4% (14,745) |
Education Levels Comparison: Drakesboro vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.7% in Drakesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Drakesboro hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- More residents in Drakesboro have less than a high school education at 28.3% compared to 19.8% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 0.8% in Drakesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.