Demographics details for Dover, FL vs Woodstock, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dover, FL vs Woodstock, MN.
| Data | Dover | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,247 | 110 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $36,055 | $53,804 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 68.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Dover vs Woodstock
- In Dover, the population is higher at 3,247, compared to 110 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Dover have a higher median age of 34.9 years compared to 33.6 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $53,804, compared to $36,055 in Dover.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.0%, compared to 33.0% in Dover.
- Dover has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Dover is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.1% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Dover vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dover | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 25 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 61 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dover vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dover at 5% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 95% compared to 25% in Dover.
- Both Dover and Woodstock have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dover at 61% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dover at 9% compared to 2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dover and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dover | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dover vs Woodstock
- More residents in Dover report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.4% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 21.7% versus 18.5% in Dover.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dover at 21.9% compared to 17.8% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 20.9% compared to 15.9% in Dover.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 34.0% in Dover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dover at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dover | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.5% (211) | 0.9% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (518) | 20.0% (22) |
| Less than High School | 55.6% (1,805) | 14.5% (16) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.9% (128) | 10.9% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dover vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Dover have no formal schooling at 6.5% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Dover.
- More residents in Dover have less than a high school education at 55.6% compared to 14.5% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 3.9% in Dover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.