Demographics details for Dover, FL vs Southaven, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dover, FL vs Southaven, MS.
| Data | Dover | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,247 | 56,360 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $36,055 | $72,513 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Dover vs Southaven
- The population in Southaven is higher at 56,360, compared to 3,247 in Dover.
- The median age in Southaven is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 34.9 years in Dover.
- Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513, compared to $36,055 in Dover.
- In Southaven, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Dover.
- Dover has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Southaven.
- The unemployment rate in Dover is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.2% in Southaven.
Demographics
Demographics Dover vs Southaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dover | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 35 |
| White | 25 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 61 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dover vs Southaven
- In Southaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 5% in Dover.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Southaven at 55% compared to 25% in Dover.
- In Southaven, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Dover.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dover at 61% compared to 5% in Southaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dover at 9% compared to 4% in Southaven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dover and Southaven at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dover | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dover vs Southaven
- More residents in Dover report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Southaven at 22.9% versus 18.5% in Dover.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dover at 21.9% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dover at 15.9% compared to 14.1% in Southaven.
- Southaven has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 34.0% in Dover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Southaven at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Dover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dover | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.5% (211) | 1.2% (658) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (518) | 15.8% (8,925) |
| Less than High School | 55.6% (1,805) | 8.7% (4,879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.9% (128) | 16.0% (9,035) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dover vs Southaven
- A higher percentage of residents in Dover have no formal schooling at 6.5% compared to 1.2% in Southaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dover hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
- More residents in Dover have less than a high school education at 55.6% compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- In Southaven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 3.9% in Dover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.