Demographics details for Dover, DE vs Little suamico, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dover, DE vs Little suamico, WI.
Data | Dover | Little suamico |
---|---|---|
Population | 38,594 | 4,878 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $54,438 | $74,800 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 56.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Dover vs Little suamico
- In Dover, the population is higher at 38,594, compared to 4,878 in Little suamico.
- The median age in Little suamico is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Dover.
- Little suamico has a higher median income of $74,800, compared to $54,438 in Dover.
- In Little suamico, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 28.0% in Dover.
- Dover has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Little suamico.
- The unemployment rate in Dover is higher at 7.5%, compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.
Demographics
Demographics Dover vs Little suamico provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dover | Little suamico |
---|---|---|
Black | 43 | 1 |
White | 34 | 95 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dover vs Little suamico
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dover at 43% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Little suamico at 95% compared to 34% in Dover.
- The Asian population is larger in Dover at 3% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dover at 9% compared to 2% in Little suamico.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dover at 10% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Dover at 1% compared to 0% in Little suamico.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dover | Little suamico |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 19.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 20.1% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 12.1% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 44.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dover vs Little suamico
- More residents in Dover report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dover at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dover at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dover at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dover at 44.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dover at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dover | Little suamico |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (268) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (6,218) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 10.5% (4,067) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (6,422) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dover vs Little suamico
- A higher percentage of residents in Dover have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dover hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- More residents in Dover have less than a high school education at 10.5% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dover hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.