Demographics details for Douglas, NE vs Holdenville, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Douglas, NE vs Holdenville, OK.
Data | Douglas | Holdenville |
---|---|---|
Population | 171 | 5,916 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 36.1 years |
Median Income | $65,000 | $38,232 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 22.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Douglas vs Holdenville
- The population in Holdenville is higher at 5,916, compared to 171 in Douglas.
- The median age in Holdenville is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 33.4 years in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher median income of $65,000 compared to $38,232 in Holdenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Douglas at 50.0% compared to 22.0% in Holdenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Holdenville at 20%, compared to 0% in Douglas.
- Holdenville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Douglas.
Demographics
Demographics Douglas vs Holdenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Douglas | Holdenville |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 7 |
White | 97 | 55 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 20 |
Demographics Comparison: Douglas vs Holdenville
- In Holdenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 55% in Holdenville.
- Both Douglas and Holdenville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Holdenville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Douglas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holdenville at 8%, compared to 2% in Douglas.
- In Holdenville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 20%, compared to 0% in Douglas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Douglas | Holdenville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 20.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | 16.2% |
Depression | 18.5% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 27.5% |
Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Douglas vs Holdenville
- In Holdenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 12.7% in Douglas.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Holdenville at 24.6% versus 18.5% in Douglas.
- Holdenville has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 13.6% in Douglas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Douglas at 23.1% compared to 14.4% in Holdenville.
- Holdenville has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 36.8% in Douglas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Douglas at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Holdenville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Douglas | Holdenville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (67) |
High School Diploma | 10.5% (18) | 23.1% (1,369) |
Less than High School | 38.6% (66) | 24.9% (1,471) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (19) | 7.0% (415) |
Education Levels Comparison: Douglas vs Holdenville
- In Holdenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Douglas.
- In Holdenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 10.5% in Douglas.
- More residents in Douglas have less than a high school education at 38.6% compared to 24.9% in Holdenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Douglas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 7.0% in Holdenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.