Demographics details for Douglas, GA vs Holcomb, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Douglas, GA vs Holcomb, KS.
Data | Douglas | Holcomb |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,685 | 2,199 |
Median Age | 30.7 years | 29.8 years |
Median Income | $39,716 | $81,111 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Douglas vs Holcomb
- In Douglas, the population is higher at 11,685, compared to 2,199 in Holcomb.
- Residents in Douglas have a higher median age of 30.7 years compared to 29.8 years in Holcomb.
- Holcomb has a higher median income of $81,111, compared to $39,716 in Douglas.
- In Holcomb, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 25.0% in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Holcomb.
- The unemployment rate in Douglas is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.0% in Holcomb.
Demographics
Demographics Douglas vs Holcomb provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Douglas | Holcomb |
---|---|---|
Black | 52 | Data is updating |
White | 33 | 36 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 11 | 45 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Douglas vs Holcomb
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Douglas at 52% compared to 0% in Holcomb.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Holcomb at 36% compared to 33% in Douglas.
- In Holcomb, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Douglas.
- Holcomb has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 11% in Douglas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holcomb at 17%, compared to 4% in Douglas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Douglas and Holcomb at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Douglas | Holcomb |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 10.5% |
Depression | 22.0% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 22.9% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 44.8% | 36.9% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Douglas vs Holcomb
- More residents in Douglas report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 14.9% in Holcomb.
- Depression is more prevalent in Douglas at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Holcomb.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Douglas at 22.9% compared to 17.1% in Holcomb.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Holcomb at 19.5% compared to 12.9% in Douglas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Douglas at 44.8% compared to 36.9% in Holcomb.
- Disability percentages are higher in Douglas at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Holcomb.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Douglas | Holcomb |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (125) | 1.1% (25) |
High School Diploma | 18.0% (2,098) | 15.5% (340) |
Less than High School | 18.9% (2,206) | 21.8% (479) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.9% (1,038) | 8.5% (188) |
Education Levels Comparison: Douglas vs Holcomb
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Douglas and Holcomb at 1.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Douglas hold a high school diploma at 18.0% compared to 15.5% in Holcomb.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Holcomb at 21.8%, compared to 18.9% in Douglas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Douglas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.9% compared to 8.5% in Holcomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.