Demographics details for Douglas, GA vs Coleman, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Douglas, GA vs Coleman, OK.
| Data | Douglas | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,685 | 297 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $39,716 | $45,938 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Douglas vs Coleman
- In Douglas, the population is higher at 11,685, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- The median age in Coleman is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 30.7 years in Douglas.
- Coleman has a higher median income of $45,938, compared to $39,716 in Douglas.
- In Coleman, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 25.0% in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Coleman.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Douglas and Coleman at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Douglas vs Coleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Douglas | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 2 |
| White | 33 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Douglas vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Douglas at 52% compared to 2% in Coleman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Coleman at 77% compared to 33% in Douglas.
- Both Douglas and Coleman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Douglas at 11% compared to 1% in Coleman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coleman at 9%, compared to 4% in Douglas.
- In Coleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 0% in Douglas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Douglas | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 44.8% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Douglas vs Coleman
- In Coleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.5% in Douglas.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coleman at 26.9% versus 22.0% in Douglas.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Douglas and Coleman at 22.9%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coleman at 14.8% compared to 12.9% in Douglas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Douglas at 44.8% compared to 40.8% in Coleman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 16.0% in Douglas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Douglas | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (125) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.0% (2,098) | 28.6% (85) |
| Less than High School | 18.9% (2,206) | 4.0% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.9% (1,038) | 11.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Douglas vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Douglas have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 18.0% in Douglas.
- More residents in Douglas have less than a high school education at 18.9% compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.9% in Douglas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.