Demographics details for Dodge city, KS vs Fort washington, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Dodge city, KS vs Fort washington, MD.

Data Dodge city Fort washington
Population 27,422 25,825
Median Age 30.3 years 44.1 years
Median Income $66,932 $143,623
Married Families 35.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Dodge city vs Fort washington

  • In Dodge city, the population is higher at 27,422, compared to 25,825 in Fort washington.
  • The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 30.3 years in Dodge city.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $66,932 in Dodge city.
  • In Fort washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Dodge city.
  • Dodge city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • Fort washington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Dodge city.

Demographics

Demographics Dodge city vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Dodge city Fort washington
Black 3 61
White 10 8
Asian 2 8
Hispanic 66 17
Two or More Races 18 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Dodge city vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 3% in Dodge city.
  • Dodge city has a higher percentage of White residents at 10% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Dodge city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Dodge city at 66% compared to 17% in Fort washington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Dodge city at 18% compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Dodge city at 1% compared to 0% in Fort washington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Dodge city Fort washington
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.8% 7.9%
Depression 17.8% 11.6%
Smoking 19.2% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 12.0%
Obesity 44.7% 37.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Dodge city vs Fort washington

  • More residents in Dodge city report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Dodge city at 17.8% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Dodge city at 19.2% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Dodge city at 16.6% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Dodge city at 44.7% compared to 37.7% in Fort washington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Dodge city at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Dodge city Fort washington
No Schooling 3.0% (817) 1.2% (297)
High School Diploma 13.2% (3,614) 14.4% (3,710)
Less than High School 28.2% (7,721) 8.3% (2,138)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.0% (3,006) 31.8% (8,208)

Education Levels Comparison: Dodge city vs Fort washington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Dodge city have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.2% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 13.2% in Dodge city.
  • More residents in Dodge city have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 11.0% in Dodge city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.