Demographics details for Dixon, MO vs Lost hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dixon, MO vs Lost hills, CA.
| Data | Dixon | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,219 | 1,754 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 23.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,900 | $41,250 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Dixon vs Lost hills
- The population in Lost hills is higher at 1,754, compared to 1,219 in Dixon.
- Residents in Dixon have a higher median age of 32.3 years compared to 23.8 years in Lost hills.
- Dixon has a higher median income of $45,900 compared to $41,250 in Lost hills.
- In Lost hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 25.0% in Dixon.
- The poverty level is higher in Lost hills at 22%, compared to 12% in Dixon.
- Lost hills has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Dixon.
Demographics
Demographics Dixon vs Lost hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dixon | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 98 | -35 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 97 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 37 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dixon vs Lost hills
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Dixon and Lost hills at 0%.
- Dixon has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to -35% in Lost hills.
- In Lost hills, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Dixon.
- Lost hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 2% in Dixon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lost hills at 37%, compared to 0% in Dixon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dixon and Lost hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dixon | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 19.8% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 24.9% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 42.1% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dixon vs Lost hills
- More residents in Dixon report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.6% in Lost hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dixon at 27.4% compared to 18.9% in Lost hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dixon at 24.9% compared to 20.9% in Lost hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dixon at 16.3% compared to 13.6% in Lost hills.
- Lost hills has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 42.1% in Dixon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dixon at 20.0% compared to 4.0% in Lost hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dixon | Lost hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (4) | 3.7% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (210) | 10.0% (175) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (184) | 64.7% (1,134) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (93) | 0.9% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dixon vs Lost hills
- In Lost hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.3% in Dixon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dixon hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 10.0% in Lost hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lost hills at 64.7%, compared to 15.1% in Dixon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dixon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.6% compared to 0.9% in Lost hills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.