Demographics details for Dixon, IL vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dixon, IL vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Dixon | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,177 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 41.2 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $52,208 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Dixon vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 15,177 in Dixon.
- Residents in Dixon have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $52,208 in Dixon.
- In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Dixon.
- Dixon has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- The unemployment rate in Dixon is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Dixon vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dixon | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 3 |
| White | 75 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dixon vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dixon at 10% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- Dixon has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Dixon.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 8% in Dixon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar park at 10%, compared to 6% in Dixon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dixon and Cedar park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dixon | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dixon vs Cedar park
- More residents in Dixon report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 20.9% in Dixon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dixon at 18.5% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Dixon and Cedar park at 17.9%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dixon at 37.7% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dixon at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dixon | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (214) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (3,148) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 18.2% (2,767) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.0% (2,122) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dixon vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of residents in Dixon have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dixon hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Dixon have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 14.0% in Dixon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.