Demographics details for Dike, TX vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dike, TX vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Dike | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103 | 681 |
| Median Age | 44.0 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Dike vs Friendship
- The population in Friendship is higher at 681, compared to 103 in Dike.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 44.0 years in Dike.
- Dike has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 20.0% in Dike.
- Dike has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Dike.
Demographics
Demographics Dike vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dike | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 100 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Dike vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Dike.
- Dike has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 84% in Friendship.
- Both Dike and Friendship have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Friendship has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Dike.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 0% in Dike.
- In Friendship, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Dike.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dike | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.4% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dike vs Friendship
- In Friendship, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Friendship at 24.3% versus 0.0% in Dike.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dike | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dike vs Friendship
- In Friendship, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- In Friendship, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.