Demographics details for Dickinson, TX vs Elk horn, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dickinson, TX vs Elk horn, IA.
| Data | Dickinson | Elk horn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,738 | 619 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 49.9 years |
| Median Income | $81,739 | $59,306 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Dickinson vs Elk horn
- In Dickinson, the population is higher at 21,738, compared to 619 in Elk horn.
- The median age in Elk horn is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 35.8 years in Dickinson.
- Dickinson has a higher median income of $81,739 compared to $59,306 in Elk horn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dickinson at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Elk horn.
- The poverty level is identical in both Dickinson and Elk horn at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Dickinson is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.6% in Elk horn.
Demographics
Demographics Dickinson vs Elk horn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dickinson | Elk horn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 36 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 39 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Dickinson vs Elk horn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dickinson at 7% compared to 0% in Elk horn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elk horn at 93% compared to 36% in Dickinson.
- The Asian population is larger in Dickinson at 1% compared to 0% in Elk horn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dickinson at 39% compared to 5% in Elk horn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dickinson at 17% compared to 1% in Elk horn.
- In Elk horn, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Dickinson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dickinson | Elk horn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 18.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 22.9% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dickinson vs Elk horn
- More residents in Dickinson report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 14.8% in Elk horn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dickinson at 22.7% compared to 18.0% in Elk horn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dickinson at 17.2% compared to 16.3% in Elk horn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elk horn at 22.9% compared to 17.6% in Dickinson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dickinson at 36.5% compared to 35.9% in Elk horn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dickinson at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Elk horn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dickinson | Elk horn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (403) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.0% (2,607) | 18.9% (117) |
| Less than High School | 18.9% (4,116) | 7.1% (44) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (3,445) | 15.3% (95) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dickinson vs Elk horn
- A higher percentage of residents in Dickinson have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Elk horn.
- In Elk horn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 12.0% in Dickinson.
- More residents in Dickinson have less than a high school education at 18.9% compared to 7.1% in Elk horn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dickinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 15.3% in Elk horn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.