Demographics details for Diamond springs, CA vs Wickliffe, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Diamond springs, CA vs Wickliffe, OH.

Data Diamond springs Wickliffe
Population 12,197 12,610
Median Age 43.7 years 43.7 years
Median Income $71,279 $76,938
Married Families 44.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 11% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Diamond springs vs Wickliffe

  • The population in Wickliffe is higher at 12,610, compared to 12,197 in Diamond springs.
  • The median age is the same in both Diamond springs and Wickliffe at 43.7 years.
  • Wickliffe has a higher median income of $76,938, compared to $71,279 in Diamond springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Diamond springs at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Wickliffe.
  • Diamond springs has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Wickliffe.
  • Wickliffe has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Diamond springs.

Demographics

Demographics Diamond springs vs Wickliffe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Diamond springs Wickliffe
Black Data is updating 6
White 72 85
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 18 2
Two or More Races 6 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Diamond springs vs Wickliffe

  • In Wickliffe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Diamond springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wickliffe at 85% compared to 72% in Diamond springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Diamond springs at 3% compared to 2% in Wickliffe.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Diamond springs at 18% compared to 2% in Wickliffe.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Diamond springs at 6% compared to 5% in Wickliffe.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Diamond springs at 1% compared to 0% in Wickliffe.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Diamond springs Wickliffe
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 10.7%
Depression 23.2% 22.3%
Smoking 12.7% 18.1%
Binge Drinking 19.0% 19.4%
Obesity 29.1% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Diamond springs vs Wickliffe

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Diamond springs and Wickliffe at 16.7%.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Diamond springs at 23.2% compared to 22.3% in Wickliffe.
  • Wickliffe has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 12.7% in Diamond springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wickliffe at 19.4% compared to 19.0% in Diamond springs.
  • Wickliffe has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 29.1% in Diamond springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Diamond springs at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Wickliffe.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Diamond springs Wickliffe
No Schooling 0.6% (73) 0.3% (32)
High School Diploma 17.2% (2,093) 22.8% (2,877)
Less than High School 5.8% (711) 8.3% (1,049)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.6% (2,271) 18.5% (2,331)

Education Levels Comparison: Diamond springs vs Wickliffe

  • A higher percentage of residents in Diamond springs have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Wickliffe.
  • In Wickliffe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 17.2% in Diamond springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wickliffe at 8.3%, compared to 5.8% in Diamond springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Diamond springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 18.5% in Wickliffe.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.