Demographics details for Diamond springs, CA vs Beaverton, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Diamond springs, CA vs Beaverton, OR.
| Data | Diamond springs | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,197 | 97,053 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $71,279 | $88,899 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Diamond springs vs Beaverton
- The population in Beaverton is higher at 97,053, compared to 12,197 in Diamond springs.
- Residents in Diamond springs have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 36.7 years in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has a higher median income of $88,899, compared to $71,279 in Diamond springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Diamond springs at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Beaverton.
- Diamond springs has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Beaverton.
- The unemployment rate in Diamond springs is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Beaverton.
Demographics
Demographics Diamond springs vs Beaverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Diamond springs | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 72 | 57 |
| Asian | 3 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Diamond springs vs Beaverton
- In Beaverton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Diamond springs.
- Diamond springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 57% in Beaverton.
- In Beaverton, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 3% in Diamond springs.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Diamond springs and Beaverton at 18%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaverton at 10%, compared to 6% in Diamond springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Diamond springs at 1% compared to 0% in Beaverton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Diamond springs | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 10.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 29.1% | 31.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Diamond springs vs Beaverton
- More residents in Diamond springs report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.6% in Beaverton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Diamond springs at 23.2% compared to 22.9% in Beaverton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Diamond springs at 12.7% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Diamond springs at 19.0% compared to 16.6% in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has higher obesity rates at 31.3% compared to 29.1% in Diamond springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Diamond springs at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaverton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Diamond springs | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 0.6% (619) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (2,093) | 9.8% (9,471) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (711) | 7.2% (7,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (2,271) | 34.9% (33,872) |
Education Levels Comparison: Diamond springs vs Beaverton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Diamond springs and Beaverton at 0.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Diamond springs hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 9.8% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaverton at 7.2%, compared to 5.8% in Diamond springs.
- In Beaverton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 18.6% in Diamond springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.