Demographics details for Diamond springs, CA vs Antlers, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Diamond springs, CA vs Antlers, OK.
Data | Diamond springs | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,197 | 2,198 |
Median Age | 43.7 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $71,279 | $27,798 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Diamond springs vs Antlers
- In Diamond springs, the population is higher at 12,197, compared to 2,198 in Antlers.
- Residents in Diamond springs have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 36.7 years in Antlers.
- Diamond springs has a higher median income of $71,279 compared to $27,798 in Antlers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Diamond springs at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Antlers.
- The poverty level is higher in Antlers at 18%, compared to 11% in Diamond springs.
- Antlers has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Diamond springs.
Demographics
Demographics Diamond springs vs Antlers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Diamond springs | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 72 | 63 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 18 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 15 |
American Indian | 1 | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Diamond springs vs Antlers
- In Antlers, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Diamond springs.
- Diamond springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 63% in Antlers.
- The Asian population is larger in Diamond springs at 3% compared to 1% in Antlers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Diamond springs at 18% compared to 5% in Antlers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Antlers at 15%, compared to 6% in Diamond springs.
- In Antlers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 1% in Diamond springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Diamond springs | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 15.6% |
Depression | 23.2% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 26.4% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 29.1% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Diamond springs vs Antlers
- In Antlers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.7% in Diamond springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Antlers at 28.5% versus 23.2% in Diamond springs.
- Antlers has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 12.7% in Diamond springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Diamond springs at 19.0% compared to 14.1% in Antlers.
- Antlers has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 29.1% in Diamond springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Antlers at 36.0% compared to 14.0% in Diamond springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Diamond springs | Antlers |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 1.0% (23) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (2,093) | 23.4% (515) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (711) | 26.2% (575) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (2,271) | 10.7% (236) |
Education Levels Comparison: Diamond springs vs Antlers
- In Antlers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Diamond springs.
- In Antlers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 17.2% in Diamond springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Antlers at 26.2%, compared to 5.8% in Diamond springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Diamond springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 10.7% in Antlers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.