Demographics details for Diamond bar, CA vs Rosholt, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Diamond bar, CA vs Rosholt, WI.
| Data | Diamond bar | Rosholt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 52,855 | 470 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $106,881 | $55,313 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Diamond bar vs Rosholt
- In Diamond bar, the population is higher at 52,855, compared to 470 in Rosholt.
- Residents in Diamond bar have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 43.9 years in Rosholt.
- Diamond bar has a higher median income of $106,881 compared to $55,313 in Rosholt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Diamond bar at 49.0% compared to 42.0% in Rosholt.
- The poverty level is higher in Rosholt at 9%, compared to 8% in Diamond bar.
- The unemployment rate in Diamond bar is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Rosholt.
Demographics
Demographics Diamond bar vs Rosholt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Diamond bar | Rosholt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 6 | 94 |
| Asian | 61 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Diamond bar vs Rosholt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Diamond bar at 4% compared to 0% in Rosholt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rosholt at 94% compared to 6% in Diamond bar.
- The Asian population is larger in Diamond bar at 61% compared to 0% in Rosholt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Diamond bar at 20% compared to 3% in Rosholt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Diamond bar at 8% compared to 3% in Rosholt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Diamond bar at 1% compared to 0% in Rosholt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Diamond bar | Rosholt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 11.7% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 6.8% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 24.6% |
| Obesity | 19.3% | 31.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Diamond bar vs Rosholt
- In Rosholt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 11.4% in Diamond bar.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rosholt at 23.2% versus 11.7% in Diamond bar.
- Rosholt has a higher smoking rate at 14.0% compared to 6.8% in Diamond bar.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rosholt at 24.6% compared to 13.2% in Diamond bar.
- Rosholt has higher obesity rates at 31.4% compared to 19.3% in Diamond bar.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rosholt at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Diamond bar.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Diamond bar | Rosholt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (1,281) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (4,746) | 28.3% (133) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (4,036) | 15.3% (72) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.3% (20,796) | 8.7% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Diamond bar vs Rosholt
- A higher percentage of residents in Diamond bar have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Rosholt.
- In Rosholt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.3% compared to 9.0% in Diamond bar.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rosholt at 15.3%, compared to 7.6% in Diamond bar.
- A higher percentage of residents in Diamond bar hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.3% compared to 8.7% in Rosholt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.