Demographics details for Dexter, MN vs Maquoketa, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dexter, MN vs Maquoketa, IA.
| Data | Dexter | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 323 | 6,054 |
| Median Age | 45.8 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $84,375 | $53,462 |
| Married Families | 59.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Dexter vs Maquoketa
- The population in Maquoketa is higher at 6,054, compared to 323 in Dexter.
- Residents in Dexter have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 40.8 years in Maquoketa.
- Dexter has a higher median income of $84,375 compared to $53,462 in Maquoketa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dexter at 59.0% compared to 38.0% in Maquoketa.
- The poverty level is higher in Maquoketa at 11%, compared to 7% in Dexter.
- The unemployment rate in Dexter is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Maquoketa.
Demographics
Demographics Dexter vs Maquoketa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dexter | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 100 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dexter vs Maquoketa
- In Maquoketa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Dexter.
- Dexter has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 96% in Maquoketa.
- Both Dexter and Maquoketa have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Maquoketa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Dexter.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maquoketa at 1%, compared to 0% in Dexter.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dexter and Maquoketa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dexter | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 20.7% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dexter vs Maquoketa
- In Maquoketa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.5% in Dexter.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dexter at 22.6% compared to 20.5% in Maquoketa.
- Maquoketa has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 18.5% in Dexter.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maquoketa at 20.7% compared to 20.4% in Dexter.
- Maquoketa has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 34.1% in Dexter.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maquoketa at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Dexter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dexter | Maquoketa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 31.0% (100) | 28.0% (1,696) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (30) | 5.3% (323) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (23) | 11.1% (673) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dexter vs Maquoketa
- In Maquoketa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Dexter.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dexter hold a high school diploma at 31.0% compared to 28.0% in Maquoketa.
- More residents in Dexter have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 5.3% in Maquoketa.
- In Maquoketa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 7.1% in Dexter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.