Demographics details for Detroit, MI vs Cuyahoga falls, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Detroit, MI vs Cuyahoga falls, OH.
| Data | Detroit | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 620,376 | 50,655 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $37,761 | $67,922 |
| Married Families | 18.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 29% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 10.7 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Detroit vs Cuyahoga falls
- In Detroit, the population is higher at 620,376, compared to 50,655 in Cuyahoga falls.
- The median age in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 35.0 years in Detroit.
- Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922, compared to $37,761 in Detroit.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 18.0% in Detroit.
- Detroit has a higher poverty level at 29% compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The unemployment rate in Detroit is higher at 10.7%, compared to 4.8% in Cuyahoga falls.
Demographics
Demographics Detroit vs Cuyahoga falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Detroit | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 80 | 5 |
| White | 6 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Detroit vs Cuyahoga falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Detroit at 80% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 81% compared to 6% in Detroit.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Detroit.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Detroit at 8% compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 5%, compared to 4% in Detroit.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Detroit and Cuyahoga falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Detroit | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 29.1% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 45.9% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Detroit vs Cuyahoga falls
- More residents in Detroit report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% versus 21.0% in Detroit.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Detroit at 29.1% compared to 18.5% in Cuyahoga falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 12.9% in Detroit.
- Obesity rates are higher in Detroit at 45.9% compared to 41.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Detroit at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Detroit | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (9,264) | 1.6% (825) |
| High School Diploma | 18.0% (111,839) | 19.4% (9,813) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (89,925) | 6.3% (3,197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (70,464) | 26.1% (13,215) |
Education Levels Comparison: Detroit vs Cuyahoga falls
- In Cuyahoga falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.5% in Detroit.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 18.0% in Detroit.
- More residents in Detroit have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
- In Cuyahoga falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 11.4% in Detroit.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.