Demographics details for Desoto, TX vs Macclenny, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Desoto, TX vs Macclenny, FL.
| Data | Desoto | Macclenny |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,968 | 7,670 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $81,736 | $62,134 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Desoto vs Macclenny
- In Desoto, the population is higher at 55,968, compared to 7,670 in Macclenny.
- Residents in Desoto have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 37.5 years in Macclenny.
- Desoto has a higher median income of $81,736 compared to $62,134 in Macclenny.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Desoto at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Macclenny.
- The poverty level is higher in Macclenny at 11%, compared to 7% in Desoto.
- The unemployment rate in Desoto is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Macclenny.
Demographics
Demographics Desoto vs Macclenny provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Desoto | Macclenny |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 67 | 19 |
| White | 6 | 66 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Desoto vs Macclenny
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Desoto at 67% compared to 19% in Macclenny.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Macclenny at 66% compared to 6% in Desoto.
- Both Desoto and Macclenny have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Desoto at 18% compared to 4% in Macclenny.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Macclenny at 9%, compared to 8% in Desoto.
- In Macclenny, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Desoto.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Desoto | Macclenny |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Desoto vs Macclenny
- In Macclenny, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.3% in Desoto.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Macclenny at 20.4% versus 19.7% in Desoto.
- Macclenny has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 15.3% in Desoto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Macclenny at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Desoto.
- Obesity rates are higher in Desoto at 37.9% compared to 36.5% in Macclenny.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Macclenny at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Desoto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Desoto | Macclenny |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (181) | 0.1% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (8,179) | 17.8% (1,365) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (4,718) | 13.5% (1,033) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.5% (11,468) | 10.4% (799) |
Education Levels Comparison: Desoto vs Macclenny
- A higher percentage of residents in Desoto have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Macclenny.
- In Macclenny, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 14.6% in Desoto.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Macclenny at 13.5%, compared to 8.4% in Desoto.
- A higher percentage of residents in Desoto hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.5% compared to 10.4% in Macclenny.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.