Demographics details for Desoto, TX vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Desoto, TX vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Desoto | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,968 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $81,736 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Desoto vs Fairburn
- In Desoto, the population is higher at 55,968, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in Desoto have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Desoto has a higher median income of $81,736 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Desoto at 34.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 7% in Desoto.
- The unemployment rate in Desoto is higher at 5.8%, compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Desoto vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Desoto | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 67 | 73 |
| White | 6 | 12 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Desoto vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 67% in Desoto.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairburn at 12% compared to 6% in Desoto.
- The Asian population is larger in Desoto at 1% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Desoto at 18% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Desoto at 8% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Desoto and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Desoto | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Desoto vs Fairburn
- More residents in Desoto report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Desoto at 19.7% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 15.3% in Desoto.
- Binge drinking is more common in Desoto at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Desoto at 37.9% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Desoto at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Desoto | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (181) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (8,179) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (4,718) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.5% (11,468) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Desoto vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Desoto.
- A higher percentage of residents in Desoto hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- More residents in Desoto have less than a high school education at 8.4% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 20.5% in Desoto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.