Demographics details for Des plaines, IL vs Farson, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Des plaines, IL vs Farson, WY.
Data | Des plaines | Farson |
---|---|---|
Population | 58,594 | 217 |
Median Age | 42.5 years | 44.5 years |
Median Income | $86,552 | $42,721 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Des plaines vs Farson
- In Des plaines, the population is higher at 58,594, compared to 217 in Farson.
- The median age in Farson is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 42.5 years in Des plaines.
- Des plaines has a higher median income of $86,552 compared to $42,721 in Farson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Des plaines at 44.0% compared to 19.0% in Farson.
- The poverty level is higher in Farson at 10%, compared to 8% in Des plaines.
- The unemployment rate in Des plaines is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.5% in Farson.
Demographics
Demographics Des plaines vs Farson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Des plaines | Farson |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 49 | 100 |
Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 21 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Des plaines vs Farson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Des plaines at 4% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farson at 100% compared to 49% in Des plaines.
- The Asian population is larger in Des plaines at 14% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Des plaines at 21% compared to 0% in Farson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Des plaines at 11% compared to 0% in Farson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Des plaines at 1% compared to 0% in Farson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Des plaines | Farson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 9.9% |
Depression | 17.3% | 20.3% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 27.4% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Des plaines vs Farson
- In Farson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.3% in Des plaines.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farson at 20.3% versus 17.3% in Des plaines.
- Farson has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 12.7% in Des plaines.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farson at 19.0% compared to 18.8% in Des plaines.
- Farson has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 27.4% in Des plaines.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farson at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Des plaines.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Des plaines | Farson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (1,445) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.0% (8,187) | 13.8% (30) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (9,387) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.3% (16,605) | 16.1% (35) |
Education Levels Comparison: Des plaines vs Farson
- A higher percentage of residents in Des plaines have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Des plaines hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 13.8% in Farson.
- More residents in Des plaines have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Des plaines hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.3% compared to 16.1% in Farson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.