Demographics details for Deridder, LA vs Methuen, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Deridder, LA vs Methuen, MA.
Data | Deridder | Methuen |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,624 | 53,241 |
Median Age | 38.1 years | 40.6 years |
Median Income | $56,607 | $93,681 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Deridder vs Methuen
- The population in Methuen is higher at 53,241, compared to 9,624 in Deridder.
- The median age in Methuen is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 38.1 years in Deridder.
- Methuen has a higher median income of $93,681, compared to $56,607 in Deridder.
- In Methuen, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Deridder.
- Deridder has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Methuen.
- Methuen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.5% in Deridder.
Demographics
Demographics Deridder vs Methuen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Deridder | Methuen |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | 5 |
White | 49 | 51 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 7 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Deridder vs Methuen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Deridder at 32% compared to 5% in Methuen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Methuen at 51% compared to 49% in Deridder.
- In Methuen, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Deridder.
- Methuen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 7% in Deridder.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Deridder at 11% compared to 10% in Methuen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Deridder and Methuen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Deridder | Methuen |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.8% |
Depression | 27.1% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 42.3% | 30.4% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Deridder vs Methuen
- More residents in Deridder report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.1% in Methuen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Deridder at 27.1% compared to 23.4% in Methuen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Deridder at 21.5% compared to 14.1% in Methuen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Methuen at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Deridder.
- Obesity rates are higher in Deridder at 42.3% compared to 30.4% in Methuen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Deridder at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Methuen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Deridder | Methuen |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (67) | 1.4% (741) |
High School Diploma | 20.4% (1,963) | 17.4% (9,266) |
Less than High School | 13.7% (1,321) | 13.9% (7,384) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (1,505) | 21.3% (11,336) |
Education Levels Comparison: Deridder vs Methuen
- In Methuen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Deridder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Deridder hold a high school diploma at 20.4% compared to 17.4% in Methuen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Methuen at 13.9%, compared to 13.7% in Deridder.
- In Methuen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 15.6% in Deridder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.