Demographics details for Deridder, LA vs Jessup, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Deridder, LA vs Jessup, MD.
| Data | Deridder | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,624 | 9,602 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,607 | $140,561 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Deridder vs Jessup
- In Deridder, the population is higher at 9,624, compared to 9,602 in Jessup.
- Residents in Deridder have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 36.8 years in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher median income of $140,561, compared to $56,607 in Deridder.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Deridder at 36.0% compared to 24.0% in Jessup.
- Deridder has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 6% in Jessup.
- The unemployment rate in Deridder is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Jessup.
Demographics
Demographics Deridder vs Jessup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Deridder | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 54 |
| White | 49 | 24 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Deridder vs Jessup
- In Jessup, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 54% compared to 32% in Deridder.
- Deridder has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 24% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Deridder.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Deridder.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Deridder at 11% compared to 6% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Deridder.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Deridder | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Deridder vs Jessup
- More residents in Deridder report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.7% in Jessup.
- Depression is more prevalent in Deridder at 27.1% compared to 15.4% in Jessup.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Deridder at 21.5% compared to 15.0% in Jessup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Deridder at 17.6% compared to 16.8% in Jessup.
- Obesity rates are higher in Deridder at 42.3% compared to 39.6% in Jessup.
- Disability percentages are higher in Deridder at 21.0% compared to 2.0% in Jessup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Deridder | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (67) | 1.5% (143) |
| High School Diploma | 20.4% (1,963) | 15.1% (1,453) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,321) | 24.7% (2,373) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (1,505) | 18.3% (1,760) |
Education Levels Comparison: Deridder vs Jessup
- In Jessup, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Deridder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Deridder hold a high school diploma at 20.4% compared to 15.1% in Jessup.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jessup at 24.7%, compared to 13.7% in Deridder.
- In Jessup, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 15.6% in Deridder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.