Demographics details for Denver, IN vs Grass range, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Denver, IN vs Grass range, MT.
| Data | Denver | Grass range |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 473 | 114 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 68.4 years |
| Median Income | $67,639 | $40,250 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Denver vs Grass range
- In Denver, the population is higher at 473, compared to 114 in Grass range.
- The median age in Grass range is higher at 68.4 years, compared to 32.3 years in Denver.
- Denver has a higher median income of $67,639 compared to $40,250 in Grass range.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Denver at 52.0% compared to 45.0% in Grass range.
- The poverty level is higher in Grass range at 14%, compared to 8% in Denver.
- The unemployment rate in Denver is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Grass range.
Demographics
Demographics Denver vs Grass range provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Denver | Grass range |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 100 | 98 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Denver vs Grass range
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Denver and Grass range at 0%.
- Denver has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 98% in Grass range.
- Both Denver and Grass range have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Denver and Grass range at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grass range at 2%, compared to 0% in Denver.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Denver and Grass range at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Denver | Grass range |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Denver vs Grass range
- More residents in Denver report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.4% in Grass range.
- Depression is more prevalent in Denver at 26.5% compared to 22.7% in Grass range.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Denver at 20.1% compared to 16.0% in Grass range.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grass range at 24.4% compared to 18.3% in Denver.
- Obesity rates are higher in Denver at 35.2% compared to 31.0% in Grass range.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grass range at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Denver.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Denver | Grass range |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 35.1% (166) | 21.1% (24) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (56) | 7.9% (9) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.4% (35) | 14.9% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Denver vs Grass range
- In Grass range, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Denver.
- A higher percentage of residents in Denver hold a high school diploma at 35.1% compared to 21.1% in Grass range.
- More residents in Denver have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 7.9% in Grass range.
- In Grass range, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 7.4% in Denver.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.