Demographics details for Deland, FL vs Maple valley, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Deland, FL vs Maple valley, WA.
| Data | Deland | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,324 | 28,220 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $71,439 | $137,595 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Deland vs Maple valley
- In Deland, the population is higher at 41,324, compared to 28,220 in Maple valley.
- Residents in Deland have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $71,439 in Deland.
- In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 34.0% in Deland.
- Deland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.4% in Deland.
Demographics
Demographics Deland vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Deland | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 2 |
| White | 60 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Deland vs Maple valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Deland at 13% compared to 2% in Maple valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Maple valley at 74% compared to 60% in Deland.
- In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Deland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Deland at 18% compared to 5% in Maple valley.
- Both Deland and Maple valley have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Deland and Maple valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Deland | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 24.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Deland vs Maple valley
- More residents in Deland report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 21.3% in Deland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Deland at 21.7% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 17.0% in Deland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Deland at 35.0% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Deland at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Deland | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (349) | 0.4% (103) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (5,817) | 10.2% (2,878) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (3,177) | 3.1% (879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (8,097) | 28.5% (8,032) |
Education Levels Comparison: Deland vs Maple valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Deland have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Maple valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Deland hold a high school diploma at 14.1% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
- More residents in Deland have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
- In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 19.6% in Deland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.