Demographics details for Deerfield, IL vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Deerfield, IL vs South jordan, UT.

Data Deerfield South jordan
Population 18,950 83,513
Median Age 44.6 years 34.4 years
Median Income $185,762 $119,822
Married Families 53.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 3% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.7

Population Comparison: Deerfield vs South jordan

  • The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 18,950 in Deerfield.
  • Residents in Deerfield have a higher median age of 44.6 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • Deerfield has a higher median income of $185,762 compared to $119,822 in South jordan.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Deerfield at 53.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
  • The poverty level is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 3% in Deerfield.
  • South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.1% in Deerfield.

Demographics

Demographics Deerfield vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Deerfield South jordan
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 87 83
Asian 5 4
Hispanic 5 7
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Deerfield vs South jordan

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Deerfield and South jordan at 0%.
  • Deerfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • The Asian population is larger in Deerfield at 5% compared to 4% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Deerfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 3% in Deerfield.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Deerfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Deerfield South jordan
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 6.6% 9.0%
Depression 17.8% 26.5%
Smoking 7.8% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 19.7% 16.9%
Obesity 26.9% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Deerfield vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 11.9% in Deerfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 17.8% in Deerfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Deerfield at 7.8% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Deerfield at 19.7% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 26.9% in Deerfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Deerfield at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Deerfield South jordan
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 2.6% (493) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 1.9% (363) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 56.9% (10,784) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Deerfield vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Deerfield.
  • In South jordan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.4% compared to 2.6% in Deerfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South jordan at 2.7%, compared to 1.9% in Deerfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Deerfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.9% compared to 27.1% in South jordan.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.