Demographics details for Decker, MI vs Erwin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Decker, MI vs Erwin, TN.
| Data | Decker | Erwin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 953 | 5,953 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 46.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,875 | $40,670 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Decker vs Erwin
- The population in Erwin is higher at 5,953, compared to 953 in Decker.
- The median age in Erwin is higher at 46.8 years, compared to 35.1 years in Decker.
- Decker has a higher median income of $56,875 compared to $40,670 in Erwin.
- In Erwin, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 41.0% in Decker.
- The poverty level is higher in Erwin at 12%, compared to 9% in Decker.
- Erwin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Decker.
Demographics
Demographics Decker vs Erwin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Decker | Erwin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 98 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Decker vs Erwin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Decker at 1% compared to 0% in Erwin.
- Decker has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 87% in Erwin.
- Both Decker and Erwin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Erwin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Decker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Erwin at 5%, compared to 1% in Decker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Decker and Erwin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Decker | Erwin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.1% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 29.7% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Decker vs Erwin
- In Erwin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Erwin at 29.7% versus 0.0% in Decker.
- Erwin has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Erwin at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Erwin has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Erwin at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Decker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Decker | Erwin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (190) | 20.2% (1,201) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (162) | 19.7% (1,170) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (66) | 11.7% (698) |
Education Levels Comparison: Decker vs Erwin
- In Erwin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- In Erwin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 19.9% in Decker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Erwin at 19.7%, compared to 17.0% in Decker.
- In Erwin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 6.9% in Decker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.