Demographics details for Debary, FL vs Broken arrow, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Debary, FL vs Broken arrow, OK.
| Data | Debary | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,956 | 117,911 |
| Median Age | 45.8 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $83,678 | $82,547 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Debary vs Broken arrow
- The population in Broken arrow is higher at 117,911, compared to 22,956 in Debary.
- Residents in Debary have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 36.8 years in Broken arrow.
- Debary has a higher median income of $83,678 compared to $82,547 in Broken arrow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Debary at 46.0% compared to 43.0% in Broken arrow.
- The poverty level is higher in Broken arrow at 10%, compared to 7% in Debary.
- The unemployment rate in Debary is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.
Demographics
Demographics Debary vs Broken arrow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Debary | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 70 | 65 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Debary vs Broken arrow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Debary at 6% compared to 5% in Broken arrow.
- Debary has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 65% in Broken arrow.
- Both Debary and Broken arrow have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Debary at 15% compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Broken arrow at 11%, compared to 5% in Debary.
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Debary.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Debary | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Debary vs Broken arrow
- In Broken arrow, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Debary.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Broken arrow at 25.0% versus 20.7% in Debary.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Debary at 18.9% compared to 14.9% in Broken arrow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Debary at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
- Broken arrow has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 30.9% in Debary.
- Disability percentages are higher in Debary at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Broken arrow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Debary | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (174) | 0.8% (935) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (3,967) | 13.2% (15,535) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (1,573) | 6.6% (7,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (4,527) | 22.2% (26,196) |
Education Levels Comparison: Debary vs Broken arrow
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Debary and Broken arrow at 0.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Debary hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 13.2% in Broken arrow.
- More residents in Debary have less than a high school education at 6.9% compared to 6.6% in Broken arrow.
- In Broken arrow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 19.7% in Debary.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.