Demographics details for Dearborn, MI vs Panacea, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dearborn, MI vs Panacea, FL.
| Data | Dearborn | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,710 | 1,152 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 46.7 years |
| Median Income | $64,600 | $36,250 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Dearborn vs Panacea
- In Dearborn, the population is higher at 107,710, compared to 1,152 in Panacea.
- The median age in Panacea is higher at 46.7 years, compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600 compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dearborn at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Panacea.
- Dearborn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Panacea.
- Panacea has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics Dearborn vs Panacea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dearborn | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 99 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dearborn vs Panacea
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dearborn at 3% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Panacea at 99% compared to 86% in Dearborn.
- The Asian population is larger in Dearborn at 3% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dearborn at 3% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dearborn at 5% compared to 1% in Panacea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dearborn and Panacea at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dearborn | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dearborn vs Panacea
- More residents in Dearborn report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.8% in Panacea.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dearborn at 26.6% compared to 22.3% in Panacea.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dearborn at 24.6% compared to 23.5% in Panacea.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in Panacea.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dearborn at 34.2% compared to 32.3% in Panacea.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dearborn | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,058) | 4.1% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,249) | 32.5% (374) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (18,849) | 55.4% (638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (22,938) | 11.9% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dearborn vs Panacea
- In Panacea, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 2.8% in Dearborn.
- In Panacea, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.5% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Panacea at 55.4%, compared to 17.5% in Dearborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 11.9% in Panacea.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.