Demographics details for Dearborn, MI vs Pachuta, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dearborn, MI vs Pachuta, MS.
| Data | Dearborn | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,710 | 199 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 53.0 years |
| Median Income | $64,600 | $31,964 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Dearborn vs Pachuta
- In Dearborn, the population is higher at 107,710, compared to 199 in Pachuta.
- The median age in Pachuta is higher at 53.0 years, compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600 compared to $31,964 in Pachuta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dearborn at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Pachuta.
- The poverty level is higher in Pachuta at 21%, compared to 12% in Dearborn.
- Pachuta has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics Dearborn vs Pachuta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dearborn | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 39 |
| White | 86 | 55 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dearborn vs Pachuta
- In Pachuta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 55% in Pachuta.
- The Asian population is larger in Dearborn at 3% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dearborn at 3% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pachuta at 6%, compared to 5% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dearborn and Pachuta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dearborn | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 15.4% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 47.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dearborn vs Pachuta
- In Pachuta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.4% in Dearborn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dearborn at 26.6% compared to 24.7% in Pachuta.
- Pachuta has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 24.6% in Dearborn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 12.9% in Pachuta.
- Pachuta has higher obesity rates at 47.3% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pachuta at 36.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dearborn | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,058) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,249) | 16.1% (32) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (18,849) | 24.6% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (22,938) | 8.0% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dearborn vs Pachuta
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Pachuta.
- In Pachuta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pachuta at 24.6%, compared to 17.5% in Dearborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 8.0% in Pachuta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.