Demographics details for Dearborn, MI vs Normal, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dearborn, MI vs Normal, IL.
| Data | Dearborn | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,710 | 52,838 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 25.2 years |
| Median Income | $64,600 | $63,965 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Dearborn vs Normal
- In Dearborn, the population is higher at 107,710, compared to 52,838 in Normal.
- Residents in Dearborn have a higher median age of 32.3 years compared to 25.2 years in Normal.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600 compared to $63,965 in Normal.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dearborn at 38.0% compared to 29.0% in Normal.
- The poverty level is identical in both Dearborn and Normal at 12%.
- Normal has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics Dearborn vs Normal provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dearborn | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 13 |
| White | 86 | 73 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dearborn vs Normal
- In Normal, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 73% in Normal.
- In Normal, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Dearborn.
- Normal has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dearborn at 5% compared to 4% in Normal.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dearborn and Normal at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dearborn | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dearborn vs Normal
- More residents in Dearborn report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.6% in Normal.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dearborn at 26.6% compared to 22.3% in Normal.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dearborn at 24.6% compared to 15.5% in Normal.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 16.5% in Normal.
- Normal has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dearborn at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Normal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dearborn | Normal |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,058) | 0.1% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,249) | 8.2% (4,307) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (18,849) | 2.5% (1,335) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (22,938) | 27.2% (14,346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dearborn vs Normal
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.1% in Normal.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 8.2% in Normal.
- More residents in Dearborn have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 2.5% in Normal.
- In Normal, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 21.3% in Dearborn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.