Demographics details for Dearborn, MI vs Greenville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dearborn, MI vs Greenville, NC.
| Data | Dearborn | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,710 | 89,233 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 26.9 years |
| Median Income | $64,600 | $47,485 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Dearborn vs Greenville
- In Dearborn, the population is higher at 107,710, compared to 89,233 in Greenville.
- Residents in Dearborn have a higher median age of 32.3 years compared to 26.9 years in Greenville.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600 compared to $47,485 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dearborn at 38.0% compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 23%, compared to 12% in Dearborn.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics Dearborn vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dearborn | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 39 |
| White | 86 | 50 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dearborn vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 50% in Greenville.
- Both Dearborn and Greenville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Greenville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dearborn at 5% compared to 4% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dearborn and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dearborn | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dearborn vs Greenville
- More residents in Dearborn report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.0% in Greenville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dearborn at 26.6% compared to 21.9% in Greenville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dearborn at 24.6% compared to 17.1% in Greenville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Dearborn and Greenville at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dearborn | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,058) | 0.6% (512) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,249) | 10.3% (9,215) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (18,849) | 4.6% (4,082) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (22,938) | 20.9% (18,672) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dearborn vs Greenville
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.6% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 10.3% in Greenville.
- More residents in Dearborn have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 4.6% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 20.9% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.