Demographics details for Dearborn, MI vs Gordon, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dearborn, MI vs Gordon, GA.
| Data | Dearborn | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,710 | 58,954 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,600 | $57,555 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Dearborn vs Gordon
- In Dearborn, the population is higher at 107,710, compared to 58,954 in Gordon.
- The median age in Gordon is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600 compared to $57,555 in Gordon.
- In Gordon, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Dearborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Gordon at 20%, compared to 12% in Dearborn.
- The unemployment rate in Dearborn is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.7% in Gordon.
Demographics
Demographics Dearborn vs Gordon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dearborn | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 86 | 71 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Dearborn vs Gordon
- In Gordon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 71% in Gordon.
- The Asian population is larger in Dearborn at 3% compared to 1% in Gordon.
- Gordon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gordon at 6%, compared to 5% in Dearborn.
- In Gordon, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Dearborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dearborn | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dearborn vs Gordon
- More residents in Dearborn report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.0% in Gordon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dearborn at 26.6% compared to 23.1% in Gordon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dearborn at 24.6% compared to 20.4% in Gordon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Gordon.
- Gordon has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gordon at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dearborn | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,058) | 1.6% (918) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,249) | 17.8% (10,497) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (18,849) | 28.5% (16,793) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (22,938) | 11.1% (6,523) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dearborn vs Gordon
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.6% in Gordon.
- In Gordon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gordon at 28.5%, compared to 17.5% in Dearborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 11.1% in Gordon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.