Demographics details for Dearborn, MI vs Cleveland heights, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Dearborn, MI vs Cleveland heights, OH.

Data Dearborn Cleveland heights
Population 107,710 44,201
Median Age 32.3 years 36.7 years
Median Income $64,600 $69,155
Married Families 38.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 12% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 4.6

Population Comparison: Dearborn vs Cleveland heights

  • In Dearborn, the population is higher at 107,710, compared to 44,201 in Cleveland heights.
  • The median age in Cleveland heights is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
  • Cleveland heights has a higher median income of $69,155, compared to $64,600 in Dearborn.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Dearborn at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Cleveland heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cleveland heights at 13%, compared to 12% in Dearborn.
  • Cleveland heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.

Demographics

Demographics Dearborn vs Cleveland heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Dearborn Cleveland heights
Black 3 42
White 86 46
Asian 3 5
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Dearborn vs Cleveland heights

  • In Cleveland heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
  • Dearborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 46% in Cleveland heights.
  • In Cleveland heights, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Dearborn.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Dearborn and Cleveland heights at 3%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Dearborn at 5% compared to 4% in Cleveland heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dearborn and Cleveland heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Dearborn Cleveland heights
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.7% 10.9%
Depression 26.6% 21.8%
Smoking 24.6% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 16.7%
Obesity 34.2% 34.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Dearborn vs Cleveland heights

  • More residents in Dearborn report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Dearborn at 26.6% compared to 21.8% in Cleveland heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Dearborn at 24.6% compared to 16.0% in Cleveland heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • Cleveland heights has higher obesity rates at 34.5% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Dearborn and Cleveland heights at 11.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Dearborn Cleveland heights
No Schooling 2.8% (3,058) 0.4% (157)
High School Diploma 12.3% (13,249) 9.5% (4,183)
Less than High School 17.5% (18,849) 3.7% (1,638)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.3% (22,938) 39.6% (17,513)

Education Levels Comparison: Dearborn vs Cleveland heights

  • A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.4% in Cleveland heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 9.5% in Cleveland heights.
  • More residents in Dearborn have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 3.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • In Cleveland heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 21.3% in Dearborn.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.