Demographics details for Dearborn, MI vs Chino hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dearborn, MI vs Chino hills, CA.
| Data | Dearborn | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,710 | 77,949 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $64,600 | $117,548 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Dearborn vs Chino hills
- In Dearborn, the population is higher at 107,710, compared to 77,949 in Chino hills.
- The median age in Chino hills is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
- Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548, compared to $64,600 in Dearborn.
- In Chino hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 38.0% in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Chino hills.
- The unemployment rate in Dearborn is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Chino hills.
Demographics
Demographics Dearborn vs Chino hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dearborn | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 86 | 14 |
| Asian | 3 | 40 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dearborn vs Chino hills
- In Chino hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, the Asian population stands at 40%, greater than 3% in Dearborn.
- Chino hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino hills at 13%, compared to 5% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dearborn and Chino hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dearborn | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 14.6% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 7.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dearborn vs Chino hills
- More residents in Dearborn report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dearborn at 26.6% compared to 14.6% in Chino hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dearborn at 24.6% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 15.3% in Chino hills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dearborn at 34.2% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dearborn at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dearborn | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,058) | 1.1% (849) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,249) | 9.6% (7,450) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (18,849) | 7.2% (5,599) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (22,938) | 34.4% (26,814) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dearborn vs Chino hills
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.1% in Chino hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
- More residents in Dearborn have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 7.2% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 21.3% in Dearborn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.