Demographics details for De soto, IL vs Chula, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in De soto, IL vs Chula, GA.
| Data | De soto | Chula |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,396 | 2,087 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 49.9 years |
| Median Income | $53,188 | $48,125 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: De soto vs Chula
- The population in Chula is higher at 2,087, compared to 1,396 in De soto.
- The median age in Chula is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 35.9 years in De soto.
- De soto has a higher median income of $53,188 compared to $48,125 in Chula.
- In Chula, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 35.0% in De soto.
- The poverty level is identical in both De soto and Chula at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in De soto is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Chula.
Demographics
Demographics De soto vs Chula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | De soto | Chula |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 11 |
| White | 86 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: De soto vs Chula
- In Chula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in De soto.
- De soto has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 76% in Chula.
- The Asian population is larger in De soto at 1% compared to 0% in Chula.
- The Hispanic community is larger in De soto at 4% compared to 2% in Chula.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chula at 11%, compared to 8% in De soto.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both De soto and Chula at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | De soto | Chula |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: De soto vs Chula
- More residents in De soto report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Chula.
- Depression is more prevalent in De soto at 24.7% compared to 0.0% in Chula.
- Smoking is more prevalent in De soto at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Chula.
- Binge drinking is more common in De soto at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Chula.
- Obesity rates are higher in De soto at 35.7% compared to 0.0% in Chula.
- Disability percentages are higher in De soto at 33.0% compared to 16.0% in Chula.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | De soto | Chula |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (9) | 0.8% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (268) | 24.1% (504) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (249) | 11.0% (229) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (237) | 15.7% (328) |
Education Levels Comparison: De soto vs Chula
- In Chula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in De soto.
- In Chula, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 19.2% in De soto.
- More residents in De soto have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 11.0% in Chula.
- A higher percentage of residents in De soto hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Chula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.