Demographics details for De queen, AR vs Snover, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in De queen, AR vs Snover, MI.
| Data | De queen | Snover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,042 | 260 |
| Median Age | 33.0 years | 51.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,207 | $44,948 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: De queen vs Snover
- In De queen, the population is higher at 6,042, compared to 260 in Snover.
- The median age in Snover is higher at 51.5 years, compared to 33.0 years in De queen.
- De queen has a higher median income of $55,207 compared to $44,948 in Snover.
- In Snover, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in De queen.
- De queen has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 9% in Snover.
- The unemployment rate in De queen is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.5% in Snover.
Demographics
Demographics De queen vs Snover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | De queen | Snover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 28 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 60 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: De queen vs Snover
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in De queen at 6% compared to 0% in Snover.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Snover at 97% compared to 28% in De queen.
- In Snover, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in De queen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in De queen at 60% compared to 0% in Snover.
- More residents identify as two or more races in De queen at 5% compared to 0% in Snover.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in De queen at 1% compared to 0% in Snover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | De queen | Snover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.2% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 44.1% | 35.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: De queen vs Snover
- More residents in De queen report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.9% in Snover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Snover at 26.5% versus 24.7% in De queen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in De queen at 24.0% compared to 22.9% in Snover.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Snover at 17.4% compared to 12.9% in De queen.
- Obesity rates are higher in De queen at 44.1% compared to 35.3% in Snover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Snover at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in De queen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | De queen | Snover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (108) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (905) | 36.5% (95) |
| Less than High School | 46.5% (2,809) | 29.2% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (421) | 1.9% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: De queen vs Snover
- A higher percentage of residents in De queen have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Snover.
- In Snover, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.5% compared to 15.0% in De queen.
- More residents in De queen have less than a high school education at 46.5% compared to 29.2% in Snover.
- A higher percentage of residents in De queen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 1.9% in Snover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.