Demographics details for De queen, AR vs Costa mesa, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in De queen, AR vs Costa mesa, CA.

Data De queen Costa mesa
Population 6,042 109,521
Median Age 33.0 years 36.4 years
Median Income $55,207 $104,981
Married Families 35.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 24% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.6

Population Comparison: De queen vs Costa mesa

  • The population in Costa mesa is higher at 109,521, compared to 6,042 in De queen.
  • The median age in Costa mesa is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 33.0 years in De queen.
  • Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981, compared to $55,207 in De queen.
  • In Costa mesa, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in De queen.
  • De queen has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 9% in Costa mesa.
  • The unemployment rate in De queen is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.6% in Costa mesa.

Demographics

Demographics De queen vs Costa mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic De queen Costa mesa
Black 6 1
White 28 40
Asian Data is updating 9
Hispanic 60 37
Two or More Races 5 12
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: De queen vs Costa mesa

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in De queen at 6% compared to 1% in Costa mesa.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Costa mesa at 40% compared to 28% in De queen.
  • In Costa mesa, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in De queen.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in De queen at 60% compared to 37% in Costa mesa.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Costa mesa at 12%, compared to 5% in De queen.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both De queen and Costa mesa at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric De queen Costa mesa
Mental Health Not Good 20.2% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 17.2% 10.4%
Depression 24.7% 18.5%
Smoking 24.0% 10.9%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 17.1%
Obesity 44.1% 27.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: De queen vs Costa mesa

  • More residents in De queen report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
  • Depression is more prevalent in De queen at 24.7% compared to 18.5% in Costa mesa.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in De queen at 24.0% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Costa mesa at 17.1% compared to 12.9% in De queen.
  • Obesity rates are higher in De queen at 44.1% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
  • Disability percentages are higher in De queen at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level De queen Costa mesa
No Schooling 1.8% (108) 1.8% (2,006)
High School Diploma 15.0% (905) 11.3% (12,406)
Less than High School 46.5% (2,809) 17.3% (18,969)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.0% (421) 31.2% (34,140)

Education Levels Comparison: De queen vs Costa mesa

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both De queen and Costa mesa at 1.8%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in De queen hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
  • More residents in De queen have less than a high school education at 46.5% compared to 17.3% in Costa mesa.
  • In Costa mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 7.0% in De queen.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.