Demographics details for De queen, AR vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in De queen, AR vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | De queen | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,042 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 33.0 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $55,207 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: De queen vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 6,042 in De queen.
- The median age in Cedar hill is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 33.0 years in De queen.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $55,207 in De queen.
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in De queen.
- De queen has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.8% in De queen.
Demographics
Demographics De queen vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | De queen | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 51 |
| White | 28 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 60 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: De queen vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 6% in De queen.
- De queen has a higher percentage of White residents at 28% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in De queen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in De queen at 60% compared to 27% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 5% in De queen.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in De queen at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | De queen | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 44.1% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: De queen vs Cedar hill
- More residents in De queen report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in De queen at 24.7% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in De queen at 24.0% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 12.9% in De queen.
- Obesity rates are higher in De queen at 44.1% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in De queen at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | De queen | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (108) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (905) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 46.5% (2,809) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (421) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: De queen vs Cedar hill
- A higher percentage of residents in De queen have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.2% in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in De queen hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in De queen have less than a high school education at 46.5% compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 7.0% in De queen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.