Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs River falls, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs River falls, WI.
Data | Dawson | River falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,138 | 16,609 |
Median Age | 43.9 years | 26.8 years |
Median Income | $84,516 | $72,247 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs River falls
- In Dawson, the population is higher at 30,138, compared to 16,609 in River falls.
- Residents in Dawson have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 26.8 years in River falls.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $72,247 in River falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dawson at 42.0% compared to 29.0% in River falls.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 7% in River falls.
- The unemployment rate in Dawson is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.5% in River falls.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs River falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dawson | River falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 88 | 91 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs River falls
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Dawson and River falls at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in River falls at 91% compared to 88% in Dawson.
- In River falls, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Dawson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dawson at 5% compared to 2% in River falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dawson at 5% compared to 4% in River falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dawson and River falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dawson | River falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 9.6% |
Depression | 22.1% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 24.3% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 35.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs River falls
- More residents in Dawson report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.0% in River falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in River falls at 23.6% versus 22.1% in Dawson.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Dawson and River falls at 14.7%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in River falls at 24.3% compared to 18.3% in Dawson.
- River falls has higher obesity rates at 35.7% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dawson at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in River falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dawson | River falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 8.9% (1,480) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 2.6% (439) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 21.9% (3,640) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs River falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in River falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 8.9% in River falls.
- More residents in Dawson have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 2.6% in River falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 21.9% in River falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.