Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Richmond, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Richmond, CA.
| Data | Dawson | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,138 | 216,288 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $84,516 | $73,000 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 40000.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 0.08 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Richmond
- The population in Richmond is higher at 216,288, compared to 30,138 in Dawson.
- Residents in Dawson have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 36.0 years in Richmond.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $73,000 in Richmond.
- In Richmond, the percentage of married families is higher at 40000.0%, compared to 42.0% in Dawson.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Richmond.
- The unemployment rate in Dawson is higher at 3.4%, compared to 0.08% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dawson | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 30 |
| White | 88 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Richmond
- In Richmond, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 1% in Dawson.
- Dawson has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 36% in Richmond.
- In Richmond, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 1% in Dawson.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- Both Dawson and Richmond have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dawson and Richmond at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dawson | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.1% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Richmond
- More residents in Dawson report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dawson at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dawson at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dawson at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dawson at 32.5% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dawson at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dawson | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Richmond
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- More residents in Dawson have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.