Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Palos park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Palos park, IL.
| Data | Dawson | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,138 | 4,792 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $84,516 | $128,370 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Palos park
- In Dawson, the population is higher at 30,138, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 43.9 years in Dawson.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $84,516 in Dawson.
- In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 42.0% in Dawson.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.4% in Dawson.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dawson | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 88 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Palos park
- In Palos park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Dawson.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Dawson and Palos park at 88%.
- Both Dawson and Palos park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dawson at 5% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- Both Dawson and Palos park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dawson and Palos park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dawson | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Palos park
- More residents in Dawson report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dawson at 22.1% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dawson at 14.7% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 18.3% in Dawson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dawson at 32.5% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dawson at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dawson | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 1.1% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 18.2% (870) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 6.0% (287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 42.1% (2,018) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.1% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- More residents in Dawson have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 23.0% in Dawson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.