Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Meriden, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Meriden, CT.
Data | Dawson | Meriden |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,138 | 60,242 |
Median Age | 43.9 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $84,516 | $63,671 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Meriden
- The population in Meriden is higher at 60,242, compared to 30,138 in Dawson.
- Residents in Dawson have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 40.2 years in Meriden.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $63,671 in Meriden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dawson at 42.0% compared to 32.0% in Meriden.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Meriden.
- The unemployment rate in Dawson is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Meriden.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Meriden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dawson | Meriden |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 8 |
White | 88 | 38 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Meriden
- In Meriden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Dawson.
- Dawson has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 38% in Meriden.
- In Meriden, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Dawson.
- Meriden has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meriden at 15%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dawson and Meriden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dawson | Meriden |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.4% |
Depression | 22.1% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Meriden
- More residents in Dawson report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.0% in Meriden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dawson at 22.1% compared to 20.9% in Meriden.
- Meriden has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dawson at 18.3% compared to 15.6% in Meriden.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 32.5%.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Dawson and Meriden at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dawson | Meriden |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 1.7% (1,003) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 21.6% (13,023) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 19.8% (11,930) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 13.9% (8,357) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Meriden
- In Meriden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.5% in Dawson.
- In Meriden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Meriden at 19.8%, compared to 15.3% in Dawson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 13.9% in Meriden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.