Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Dawson | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,138 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $84,516 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Live oak
- In Dawson, the population is higher at 30,138, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- Residents in Dawson have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dawson at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is identical in both Dawson and Live oak at 16%.
- Live oak has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.4% in Dawson.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dawson | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | 88 | 41 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Dawson.
- Dawson has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- The Asian population is larger in Dawson at 1% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dawson and Live oak at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dawson | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Dawson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dawson at 22.1% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dawson at 18.3% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Live oak has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dawson at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dawson | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.5% in Dawson.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- More residents in Dawson have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.