Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Holcomb, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Holcomb, KS.
| Data | Dawson | Holcomb |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,138 | 2,199 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 29.8 years |
| Median Income | $84,516 | $81,111 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Holcomb
- In Dawson, the population is higher at 30,138, compared to 2,199 in Holcomb.
- Residents in Dawson have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 29.8 years in Holcomb.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $81,111 in Holcomb.
- In Holcomb, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 42.0% in Dawson.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Holcomb.
- The unemployment rate in Dawson is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.0% in Holcomb.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Holcomb provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dawson | Holcomb |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 45 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Holcomb
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dawson at 1% compared to 0% in Holcomb.
- Dawson has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 36% in Holcomb.
- In Holcomb, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Dawson.
- Holcomb has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holcomb at 17%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dawson and Holcomb at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dawson | Holcomb |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Holcomb
- More residents in Dawson report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.9% in Holcomb.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dawson at 22.1% compared to 19.0% in Holcomb.
- Holcomb has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Holcomb at 19.5% compared to 18.3% in Dawson.
- Holcomb has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dawson at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Holcomb.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dawson | Holcomb |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 1.1% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 15.5% (340) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 21.8% (479) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 8.5% (188) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Holcomb
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.1% in Holcomb.
- In Holcomb, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Holcomb at 21.8%, compared to 15.3% in Dawson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 8.5% in Holcomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.