Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Chester, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Chester, MT.
Data | Dawson | Chester |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,138 | 852 |
Median Age | 43.9 years | 49.1 years |
Median Income | $84,516 | $52,750 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Chester
- In Dawson, the population is higher at 30,138, compared to 852 in Chester.
- The median age in Chester is higher at 49.1 years, compared to 43.9 years in Dawson.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $52,750 in Chester.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dawson at 42.0% compared to 33.0% in Chester.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 13% in Chester.
- Chester has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Dawson.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Chester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dawson | Chester |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 88 | 94 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Chester
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dawson at 1% compared to 0% in Chester.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chester at 94% compared to 88% in Dawson.
- The Asian population is larger in Dawson at 1% compared to 0% in Chester.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dawson at 5% compared to 1% in Chester.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dawson at 5% compared to 4% in Chester.
- In Chester, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Dawson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dawson | Chester |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.8% |
Depression | 22.1% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 20.7% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Chester
- In Chester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.7% in Dawson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chester at 26.6% versus 22.1% in Dawson.
- Chester has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chester at 20.7% compared to 18.3% in Dawson.
- Chester has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chester at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Dawson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dawson | Chester |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 0.2% (2) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 16.1% (137) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 11.9% (101) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 16.1% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Chester
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Chester.
- In Chester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- More residents in Dawson have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 11.9% in Chester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 16.1% in Chester.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.