Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Chapman, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Chapman, KS.
| Data | Dawson | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,138 | 1,371 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $84,516 | $66,964 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Chapman
- In Dawson, the population is higher at 30,138, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- Residents in Dawson have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 41.4 years in Chapman.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $66,964 in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dawson at 42.0% compared to 33.0% in Chapman.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 8% in Chapman.
- The unemployment rate in Dawson is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Chapman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dawson | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dawson at 1% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- Dawson has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 81% in Chapman.
- In Chapman, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Dawson.
- Chapman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chapman at 7%, compared to 5% in Dawson.
- In Chapman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Dawson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dawson | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Chapman
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Dawson and Chapman at 15.7%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dawson at 22.1% compared to 21.4% in Chapman.
- Chapman has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 18.3% in Dawson.
- Chapman has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chapman at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Dawson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dawson | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 12.3% (168) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 5.1% (70) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 15.5% (212) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
- In Chapman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- More residents in Dawson have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 15.5% in Chapman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.