Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Carthage, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Carthage, IN.
| Data | Dawson | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,138 | 917 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $84,516 | $43,958 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Carthage
- In Dawson, the population is higher at 30,138, compared to 917 in Carthage.
- Residents in Dawson have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 38.0 years in Carthage.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $43,958 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dawson at 42.0% compared to 24.0% in Carthage.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Dawson.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dawson | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 98 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Carthage
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dawson at 1% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carthage at 98% compared to 88% in Dawson.
- The Asian population is larger in Dawson at 1% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dawson at 5% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dawson at 5% compared to 2% in Carthage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dawson and Carthage at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dawson | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 27.3% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.7% in Dawson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 27.3% versus 22.1% in Dawson.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dawson at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Dawson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dawson | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 0.9% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 18.4% (169) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 15.3% (140) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 2.2% (20) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Carthage
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.9% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 15.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 2.2% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.