Demographics details for Davenport, WA vs Rutherford, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Davenport, WA vs Rutherford, NJ.
Data | Davenport | Rutherford |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,778 | 18,662 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 40.5 years |
Median Income | $71,486 | $128,576 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Davenport vs Rutherford
- The population in Rutherford is higher at 18,662, compared to 1,778 in Davenport.
- The median age in Rutherford is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 36.2 years in Davenport.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576, compared to $71,486 in Davenport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Davenport at 48.0% compared to 42.0% in Rutherford.
- Davenport has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Rutherford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.2% in Davenport.
Demographics
Demographics Davenport vs Rutherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Davenport | Rutherford |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 83 | 49 |
Asian | 2 | 16 |
Hispanic | 7 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Davenport vs Rutherford
- In Rutherford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Davenport.
- Davenport has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 2% in Davenport.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 7% in Davenport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rutherford at 11%, compared to 6% in Davenport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Davenport and Rutherford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Davenport | Rutherford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 7.8% |
Depression | 27.3% | 17.0% |
Smoking | 15.5% | 10.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 24.9% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Davenport vs Rutherford
- More residents in Davenport report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Davenport at 27.3% compared to 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Davenport at 15.5% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Davenport at 18.8% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Davenport at 31.8% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Davenport at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Davenport | Rutherford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (161) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (258) | 12.4% (2,318) |
Less than High School | 8.2% (145) | 6.3% (1,175) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (292) | 38.9% (7,259) |
Education Levels Comparison: Davenport vs Rutherford
- In Rutherford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Davenport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Davenport hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- More residents in Davenport have less than a high school education at 8.2% compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 16.4% in Davenport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.